Our website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

France favours gas terminals over new pipeline to tackle crisis

by jcp
Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

By Forrest Crellin and Isla Binnie

PARIS (Reuters) – A third gas pipeline between Spain and France would cost at least 3 billion euros ($3 billion) and take years to complete, making it a less attractive option to address Europe’s supply worries than new terminals to receive fuel by boat, France’s energy transition ministry said.

The European Union is bracing for any further fall in gas flows from Russia, which had been the 27-nation bloc’s biggest supplier before it invaded its neighbour Ukraine in February and trade was disrupted.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said last week that building a pipeline from Portugal through Spain and France to the central European states that are more reliant on Russian gas would “massively relieve the supply situation”.

Spain hosts Europe’s largest fleet of terminals that can receive liquefied natural gas (LNG) from countries such as the United States and Qatar, but has limited capacity to take that on to other countries.

The French ministry said in a statement that new LNG terminals, which can be made to float, in Northern and Eastern Europe, particularly Germany, would be a quicker and cheaper option than a new pipeline.

Discussions around new infrastructure have included reviving a project to build a pipeline across the Pyrenees that was partially constructed before being shelved in 2019.

Regulators on both sides of the border decided at the time the project did not meet market needs. It met local opposition in the Rhone Valley and from environmental associations, the French ministry said, adding:

“Such a project would take many years to become operational … and would therefore not respond to the current crisis.”

Spanish officials have recently talked in more concrete terms about the project, stipulating that the European Union would have to pay. Gas grid operator Enagas has said the whole thing could be finished in 2-1/2 years at a cost of 600 million-700 million euros.

Broader aims to slash planet-warming carbon emissions must also be taken into account, the French ministry said, underlining the use of hydrogen, which can be produced with renewable electricity, is in its infancy.

Enagas and other European operators are working on preparing the continent’s infrastructure to carry hydrogen.

($1 = 0.9939 euros)

 

(Reporting by Forrest Crellin and Isla Binnie; Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)

You may also like